Posts Mentioning RSS Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • JohnH 9:00 pm on February 3, 2010 Permalink
    Tags: , , , , nofollow, scraping   

    Scrape Hate – Aggregate 

    day52
    Creative Commons License photo credit: the half-blood prince

    A lot of hate going on in the blogosphere around content scraping and aggregating. I noticed it first around a couple of posts coming out of Aaron Wall’s SEOBook.com blog (here and here) directed at Jason Calacanis and Mahalo.com It boils down to this, again from Aaron Wall in a response to a question in the comments.

    When you take 3rd party content (without permission and offer no way to opt out) AND then use that content to pad out a page AND then put it below the fold (so it helps pull in search visitors but rarely sends any traffic out to the sources) AND you strip attribution from the links THEN all that does is “borrow” content & steal traffic from smaller sites (using their own content against them).
    I guess if the links were not nofollowed it wouldn’t be so slimy.

    Wait a second, isn’t that what I’m doing? Let’s have a look.

    Taking 3rd party content without permission…
    Right, I’m doing that. I mean, but anyone could opt out with a simple email.
    below the fold
    Well no, not in my case.
    AND you strip attribution from the links
    Shit, I think I was doing that. I guess because I just copied and pasted the code. So I went back and fixed that. Those are now follow links.

    In the absence of feedback I’m simply building on what I’m seeing other sites do.

    In my naivete this is how I’m thinking about it, why I think it’s ok…
    I’m not taking the full post-just a long enough, and juicy enough bit to whet the appetite of the reader and to let them see that the author is the real deal. In the rare instance I do take a full post, it’s because it’s short but deserving of attention and either to a blog that is just getting started, OR their ad is in the post footer. The link back to the original post is front and center.  And lastly I’m not running any ads.

    What do you think? Is this a fair approach to aggregation?

    See Also:
    Excellent overview of the entire space How Search Engines, Aggregators & Blogs Use News Content
    Blames Google for setting the bar so low Google’s Legacy – the Internet Cesspool
    Changed his mind about full content feeds The Positives and Negatives of Having Your Articles and Website “Scraped”

     
  • JohnH 1:21 am on January 1, 2010 Permalink | Log in to leave a Comment
    Tags: , , ,   

    Outsource Your Attention! Readerss.com 

    We read it for you. Readerss.com


    Where we’re headed: We read it for you!
    Readerss consume hundreds of niche topic news and blog articles daily, pick the best, and share them with you. Readerss are real people, not algorithms. We weed out the spam, the cheesy link bait, the SEO keyword dross, all the manufactured news, to connect you with what deserves your attention.

    Where we’re at: Are you using Google Reader to scan 100s of blog posts a day for those choice bits of special information? Perhaps you’d consider becoming a part of an aggregation experiment. I started out to do this alone, but what I’ve discovered is that caring for even one of these blog niches is a LOT of work! I’ve got my hands full with Domainerss.com (130 blogs and counting). So I’m looking for some knowledgable, passionate, people to handle aggregation for these other domains: InternetMarketerss.com, ProBloggerss.com, SeoBloggerss.com, WebDesignerss.com and WebDeveloperss.com

    Automated aggregation catches all the noise. And in a space where smart people are vying for search ranking by spewing out tons of content, the amount of information becomes overwhelming. Wouldn’t it be great if there was a portal for a favorite niche you knew you could trust to find all the best new content?

    Readerss.com wants to be a community of people-powered, domain-driven, blog aggregators. It’s not about ripping off content, it’s about weeding and pruning.

    What’s in it for you? Right now it’s hard to say, apart from the satisfaction of collecting all your favorite posts, including yours, into one place. Online income derives from traffic so only if/when Readerss.com became popular would it be practical to attempt to monetize. But hey, who knows? With an expert (or at least aspiring to be) Domainer, Internet Marketer, Pro Blogger, Seo Blogger, Web Developer and Web Designer on board, we might have the beginnings of a startup.

    Anyway, like I said, it’s an experiment for now and if you’d like to participate it’s as simple as hooking up a Google Reader feed to the site I’ve already built. Try it! Please email me, john@readerss.com for details.

    Best,
    John Humphrey

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel